<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Confused About Windows Version Numbering?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cornellfinch.com/2008/05/28/microsoft-confused-about-windows-version-numbering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cornellfinch.com/2008/05/28/microsoft-confused-about-windows-version-numbering/</link>
	<description>Why stop now, just when I'm hating it?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cwxwwwxdfvwwxwx</title>
		<link>http://www.cornellfinch.com/2008/05/28/microsoft-confused-about-windows-version-numbering/comment-page-1/#comment-1701</link>
		<dc:creator>cwxwwwxdfvwwxwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 05:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cornellfinch.com/?p=30#comment-1701</guid>
		<description>well, hi admin adn people nice forum indeed. how's life? hope it's introduce branch ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, hi admin adn people nice forum indeed. how&#8217;s life? hope it&#8217;s introduce branch ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.cornellfinch.com/2008/05/28/microsoft-confused-about-windows-version-numbering/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cornellfinch.com/?p=30#comment-25</guid>
		<description>You know, I forgot to include 2000 and NT!  Oops!  Just realised though (thinking about it via your link) perhaps it's just "business" versions.  Although, even then they would have missed Windows 2000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I forgot to include 2000 and NT!  Oops!  Just realised though (thinking about it via your link) perhaps it&#8217;s just &#8220;business&#8221; versions.  Although, even then they would have missed Windows 2000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://www.cornellfinch.com/2008/05/28/microsoft-confused-about-windows-version-numbering/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cornellfinch.com/?p=30#comment-24</guid>
		<description>http://windows7news.com/2008/02/06/why-is-the-next-windows-called-windows-7/#comment-418

One explanation that may or may not be the right one; Microsoft just ignore certain versions of the OS at random.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://windows7news.com/2008/02/06/why-is-the-next-windows-called-windows-7/#comment-418" rel="nofollow">http://windows7news.com/2008/02/06/why-is-the-next-windows-called-windows-7/#comment-418</a></p>
<p>One explanation that may or may not be the right one; Microsoft just ignore certain versions of the OS at random.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://www.cornellfinch.com/2008/05/28/microsoft-confused-about-windows-version-numbering/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cornellfinch.com/?p=30#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I was going to say that I think they take the numbering from NT, but even that doesn't work out. Maybe this is why Microsoft software is so problematic - they fundamentally don't understand numbers, so nothign ever adds up properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say that I think they take the numbering from NT, but even that doesn&#8217;t work out. Maybe this is why Microsoft software is so problematic - they fundamentally don&#8217;t understand numbers, so nothign ever adds up properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
